The Efling board fully supports the resolution of the Central Committee of the Icelandic People's Union on the illegal war of aggression by the United States and Israel against Iran, see here: In the first hours of the illegal attacks, the United States had bombed an Iranian elementary school and killed nearly two hundred girls and their teachers. Everything indicates that this was an intentional act, but such a thing is a gross violation of international law and treaties. We support the demands that the crime be investigated and those responsible be held accountable before a war crimes tribunal. The attacks by the United States and Israel on Iran are a violation of the country's sovereignty and the indisputable right of the Iranians to determine their own destiny. The attack is unprovoked, is a crime against peace and a war crime, and thus violates the United Nations Charter. This is a gross violation of the entire international legal system established in the wake of the war crimes committed in World War II, an act that civilized nations have a duty to resist. The Efling government demands that the Icelandic government condemn the war actions of the United States and Israel. The Icelandic government cannot fail to contribute to the fight for peaceful relations between the nations of the world.
Efling new website – A huge step forward in service to members
The Icelandic rental market is not an afterthought or a patch on the housing market. Many Efling members are in the rental market for the long term, and the problems of the rental market will not be solved by simply hoping that tenants will move into owner-occupied housing. This is the content of a resolution adopted at Efling Parliament on February 27, which calls for fundamental reforms to the Icelandic rental market. The resolution lists Efling union's ten demands for the Icelandic government to address the major problems in the rental market. The main demands include: Establish laws and regulations that limit sudden rent increases, support long-term contracts, and reward reliable tenants. Ensure regular inspections of rental housing to assess the condition and fair price. Lease agreements shall be in Icelandic krónur. Rent benefits shall be individualized, based on each tenant's income. Databases of tenants and landlords shall be established to promote transparency. Large-scale short-term rentals for tourists must be limited. The supply of rental housing must be greatly increased and the role of non-profit rental companies in such development must be ensured. A housing company for workers should then be established where it would be possible to acquire apartments through lease purchase. The resolution follows in its entirety below. Renting Icelandic authorities must face the fact that the rental market is not an afterthought or a band-aid on the Icelandic housing market. Numerous Efling members are in the rental market for the long term and have to rely on a rental agreement as a lifeline in their existence. The problems of the rental market will not be solved by simply hoping that tenants will move into owner-occupied housing. In a healthy housing market, people can choose between acquiring affordable housing or renting safely and economically. A humane, regulated and stable rental market needs to be established that is a viable alternative for working people, similar to that seen in our neighboring countries. Efling members make the following demands of the Icelandic government regarding the rental market: Far from enough has been done to curb the powers of landlords to make the existence of tenants a game. Laws and regulations need to be established that ensure fair and reliable restrictions on rent increases, encourage long-term contracts and reward reliable tenants who meet all the conditions of the lease. It must be ensured that the relevant authorities (e.g. HMS) can carry out inspections according to the powers that must be implemented to ensure that these regulations and laws are respected. Regular inspections of rental housing, for example every two years, need to be carried out so that the condition can be assessed, a fair market price can be determined and quality, safety and transparency in the rental market can be ensured. Lease agreements should be made in Icelandic krónur, not in foreign currencies. Landlords should be responsible for ensuring that the registration of tenants living in rental housing is accurate and up-to-date. Housing benefits should be calculated individually, based on each tenant’s personal income, rather than on joint income. Such an approach would be more consistent with Article 76 of the Icelandic Constitution, which guarantees individual rights to social assistance. It is also important to set up a database of tenants and landlords. Access to such information contributes to a healthy rental market by increasing trust and transparency in the process for both parties. In addition, access to an independent party that both tenants and landlords can turn to must be ensured, to record and preserve images of the condition of the apartment before and after the rental. Such registration can be used as impartial evidence and contribute to a fair settlement of the security deposit/deposit at the end of the rental period. The scourge of short-term rental of residential property for tourists needs to be tackled much more severely. Renting out a home for a short period of time within a year can be considered a secondary occupation for families. But this should not be a large-scale industry for investors and hustlers that sells off a significant portion of the residential property that the people of the country need to be able to live a safe and normal life. The supply of rental housing needs to be increased, as part of a more extensive, funded and timed housing plan by the government, prepared according to reliable forecasts and in consultation with the municipalities. The role of non-profit rental companies in this development needs to be secured, for example through Bjarg, which has proven its value as a concise resource for people on lower wages. A housing company for workers should also be established where there is a possibility of acquiring the apartments through rental.
The operators of the restaurant Italia have been sentenced to a three-year business ban. Elvar Ingimarsson and Björgvin Narfi Ásgeirsson, former owners of Ítalgest ehf, the restaurant's operating company, were sentenced to a business ban by the Reykjavík District Court on January 12. The Supreme Court has now upheld the district court's ruling. Efling union initiated proceedings due to abuse, wage theft and violations of rights at the restaurant Italia, as well as at other restaurants run by Elvar and Björgvin Narfi, in September 2024. The union drew attention to numerous and serious violations of the rights of workers at the restaurants in question, which had been ongoing for a long time. Efling Board of Trustees adopted a resolution at its meeting on September 12, 2024, condemning the abuse of labor and wage theft at the restaurant Italia. After the meeting, a solidarity action was taken on Frakkastígur outside the restaurant. Efling then collected testimonies from employees who had worked in their company's restaurants, gathered data and presented them to draw attention to violations against workers. This created considerable media debate. The company Ítalgest was declared bankrupt on October 9, 2024. Elvar subsequently tried to claim that Efling legitimate actions had led to the bankruptcy. This was untrue, as a request for bankruptcy of Ítalgest had been submitted a week before Efling actions began. It therefore clearly showed the kind of impasse its owners had put the company in, with irresponsible operations and violations against employees. The District Court's judgment, and the confirmation of the Supreme Court, confirm the kind of violations that took place in the company's operations. The administrator of the bankruptcy estate of Ítalgest, Björn Þorri Viktorsson, demanded that Elvar and Björgvin Narfi be banned from business operations due to their involvement in the company, whose operations were more reminiscent of organized crime than restaurant operations. Thus, numerous unexplained payments were found from the company into the personal accounts of the partners, or to people with family ties to them. Claims against the bankruptcy estate amounted to around 116 million krónur, but almost no assets were found in it. Therefore, the partners, Elvar Ingimarsson and Björgvin Narfi Ásgeirsson, were sentenced to a three-year ban on business operations, which is the maximum penalty under the law. Efling welcomes the fact that what appears to have been organized, long-term criminal activity by the partners is being addressed. It is unacceptable that people can get away with violating workers for so many years, without any consequences. Here you can see Efling coverage of the criminal activities of Elvar Ingimarsson and Björgvin Narfi Ásgeirsson.
Guests, both foreign and domestic, addressed the session and contributed to the discussion, and their presentations attracted attention and sparked further discussion among the attendees. The accompanying photos from the session provide an insight into the atmosphere, from the work on issues and professional groups to the guest addresses.
Efling members demand that the government guarantee workers safe access to housing and that housing be recognized as a human right, not an investment tool. This is the keynote of the Efling resolution, which was approved on the final day of the session, February 27. The resolution emphasizes that housing security is a fundamental prerequisite for welfare and that the current situation, where many people live in insecurity and high costs, is unacceptable. Among the main demands are stricter rules against housing booms, including increased taxation on more than three properties and restrictions on short-term rentals. The members also want to place restrictions on investor buyouts of residential property and ensure that properties are primarily used by the country's residents. Efling also demands a clear and funded government plan to build around 4,000 apartments annually, in collaboration with local authorities, in addition to ensuring sufficient land supply and removing planning obstacles. There are also calls for more realistic payment estimates for housing loans, a reduction in interest rates and a limit on real interest rates. Members also want local authorities to build apartments and sell them at cost, for a portion of new construction to be specifically intended for first-time buyers and for interest rate subsidies to be increased. The resolution in its entirety can be read below. Owner-occupied housing Housing security should be a cornerstone of workers' welfare. The home is the place where workers regain their strength after a hard day's work. The home is the family's refuge, where children are raised and relationships are cultivated. The home is part of a wider community – an apartment building, a street, a neighborhood – which is connected to the preschool, the elementary school, the sports club, the swimming pool and social life. Feeling comfortable at home and knowing that there is a safe haven for the future is of infinite value. Children who experience rootlessness carry it with them into the future, which can cause school dropout, disorder and social problems. Putting a roof over their head should not be a source of anxiety, insecurity and distress or lead to incapacity for work for these reasons. Workers should not fear frequent relocations, that residence is subject to the landlord's discretion, that children must repeatedly change schools and groups of friends, or that housing costs will suddenly increase so that it becomes difficult to provide for the necessities of life. It is the demand Efling members that the Icelandic state guarantee workers who have permanent residence in Iceland secure access to owner-occupied housing. This should not be the privilege of the middle class and those who receive housing support as an inheritance. Efling members make the following demands to the Icelandic government regarding private housing: Housing is a human right, not a financial burden. Stricter rules must be set at all levels to combat the housing boom, for example by increasing property taxes after a third property, except for non-profit rental companies, and by making residential housing available for profit-driven short-term rentals. Usable residential housing, which already exists, should be used by the people of the country first and foremost, and this should be ensured through rules that work and incentives that are effective. Significant restrictions should be placed on the ability of financial owners to buy up apartments for profit. Anyone who buys an apartment in Iceland should be a taxpayer in Iceland. According to the Housing and Civil Engineering Institute, around four thousand apartments need to be built per year over the next few decades. The government needs to put together a time-bound and funded plan for increasing the number of apartments and work on it in collaboration with the municipalities and residents' associations so that the residents who live there are taken into account. It is necessary to ensure that land supply is available and that planning obstacles are removed. Such a plan must be realistic and based on the best possible forecasts of population growth in the coming decades. New housing must be built in a human- and family-friendly manner. Time limits should be set for the use of land after the building right has been purchased. The state should monitor that rules are enforced. Housing loans are an inevitable byproduct of acquiring housing. Efling members want sensible rules to be set for the implementation of payment assessments. Those who are already truly under high rent payments should be able to have their payment capacity assessed. Payment assessments should be assessed based on reality and not on artificial criteria. The current high-interest rate policy is intolerable. It is a great disappointment that the government's promise of an interest rate cut has turned into an inflated interest rate balloon that will, if anything, burst. The government needs to put together a realistic, timely and detailed plan on how to bring down inflation and get out of the high-interest environment in the next 2-6 years. Efling members support the involvement of the social partners in such a plan, as it should be about defending the interests and improving the situation of workers in Iceland. Set a limit on how much real interest the bank can charge on housing loans. It must be ensured that a sufficiently large proportion of newly built residential housing is intended for first-time buyers and workers. Municipalities build apartments to then sell at cost price. Rules on interest subsidies must be expanded. Efling members also demand that Gildir Pension Fund work within the pension fund system to promote more favorable housing loans for fund members.
“The struggle of workers at Emeis, the largest private long-term care provider in Poland, clearly shows us how much organized union struggle can achieve, even in difficult circumstances and fierce resistance from employers,” said Anna Bacia, chairwoman of the Polish Care Workers’ Union, OPZZ-KP, at Efling Parliament today. OPZZ-KP was founded at the end of 2018 and the first years were characterized by conflicts and systematic resistance from employers, according to Anna. However, the workers’ struggle was not isolated, but enjoyed the support of the international trade union movement and support from patients and their families, including through petitions and protests outside nursing homes. The struggle is successful despite resistance Anna herself was fired in 2019 after she took on the position of shop steward at Emeis, another example of the company’s fierce resistance to the union and the employees’ attempts to secure their own rights. She described how, fortunately, she had a lot of support; protests were held outside the nursing home and elsewhere, and she was well supported by Uni Global Union. “For two years, OPZZ-KP had to work almost ‘underground’, in very difficult conditions. Our members therefore did not dare to take on shop steward positions for fear of losing their jobs. But in 2021, the situation changed when I was given my job back by a court order. Thus began a new chapter in the struggle,” she said. “In 2022, a cooperation agreement was signed and formal negotiations began with the company. At the same time, the strength of the association increased, both in numbers and influence. Members organized joint actions, collected data and demands, and built up pressure in a targeted manner,” she added. Clear demands for improved conditions In March 2025, a formal wage dispute began with clear demands, which Anna Bacia specifically mentioned: Wage increases for non-healthcare workers Seniority-related payments Bonuses and additional payments Recognition and improved status of care workers “These demands reflect the reality that care workers live in, where wages are low and stress is high,” she said. Anna Bacia emphasized that the struggle had developed from a defensive struggle to a visible and public movement. “Staff have come forward under their names and faces, including on social media, and made their demands visible.” Despite this, the conciliation process ended in February 2026 with a statement of disagreement. The next step for discussion is a strike. She asks: “Are the staff ready to resort to a strike to enforce justice?” National solidarity key The struggle has also broadened. Poland’s largest trade union federations have formed a coalition and worked on a proposal for a collective agreement for the entire care sector. “This work has already yielded results, including in increased dialogue with the government and joint policy-making between unions in the public and private sectors,” said Anna Bacia. A clear lesson for Iceland “The experience from Poland shows that success is not achieved without conflict. It requires organization, perseverance and solidarity. It also shows that even in a difficult environment, it is possible to build a strong labor movement that drives change,” she said, adding: “For the Icelandic labor market, this is a reminder of the importance of protecting workers’ rights, especially in sectors where vulnerable groups work and there is a risk of abuse. When employers refuse to negotiate and respect workers’ demands, workers must be ready to use their strongest weapons.” “The fight against Emeis in Poland is far from over, but it has already shown that solidarity is crucial and that change only comes when there is enough pressure,” Anna Bacia concluded. Efling members also fired for wage struggle In the discussion following Anna's speech, Sólveig Anna Jónsdóttir, chairwoman Efling , reported that Efling members had also been fired from their jobs for their participation in labor struggles, and that such members were among those in the room today. She also stated that Efling had been invited and had assisted Anna and OPZZ-KP in their struggle. Asked whether the union had received any support from the Polish government in its struggle, Anna Bacia said no: "We have to fight for all our rights and wage improvements ourselves."
“We are sending a clear message that wage theft is a crime, not just a violation of the rules.” This was stated in a speech by Lars Christian Fjeldstad at Efling Parliament today. Such a message is at the heart of Norwegian legislation, where wage theft is defined as a criminal economic crime and can be punishable by up to six years in prison. Fjeldstad, who is a lawyer for the Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO), gave a detailed presentation on the Norwegian experience with the legislation. In his presentation, Fjeldstad outlined how Norway became the first European country to introduce specific criminal provisions against wage theft, after a bill to that effect was passed in 2021 and came into force at the beginning of 2022. He pointed out that the beginning could be traced to a proposal from Fagforbundet, Norway’s largest trade union, which was supported by both LO and the Norwegian Labour Party. Up to six years in prison for wage theft Fjeldstad explained that under the law, employers who deliberately withhold wages, vacation or other payments can face up to two years in prison, but up to six years if the violations are large-scale. “The law is aimed, among other things, at preventing those who engage in wage theft from gaining a competitive advantage, but no less, and at the same time, at protecting workers who are often in a vulnerable position,” said Fjeldstad. He pointed out that the provision covers both statutory and contractual rights, including overtime, vacation and other payments. Intent is key In his speech, Fjeldstad emphasized that the law focuses on deliberate violations. “We are not punishing honest mistakes,” he said, explaining that genuine misunderstandings or disagreements about the interpretation of rules generally fall outside the scope of the penalty. “But when an employer knows that they are engaging in wage theft, for profit, then it is a criminal act,” he added. Fjeldstad reviewed several examples from Norwegian courts. Among them, he mentioned a case in which an employer was convicted of underpaying an employee millions of kronor, as well as the so-called Fibertec case in which a managing director received an unconditional prison sentence for large-scale wage theft. He also drew particular attention to a recent appeals ruling from January 2026, in which systematic underpayment of 13 employees was considered one continuous crime. “The court rejected the idea that financial difficulties could justify such conduct,” said Fjeldstad. Fierce opposition in Iceland prevents legislation In the discussion after the lecture, Sólveig Anna Jónsdóttir, chairwoman Efling , pointed out that the amounts mentioned by Fjeldstad were not dissimilar to those that Efling saw in her cases in this country. The difference, however, was that the criminal sanctions in Iceland were much weaker. Fjeldstad also said that in Norway a broad consensus had emerged on the need for such legislation and that it had not met with significant political opposition. Sólveig Anna said that this was completely different from the situation in Iceland, where attempts to enact similar laws had been met with fierce opposition. She said that she found this incomprehensible in light of the fact that she was confident that support for such legislation was very high among the public. “The pressure from employers on politicians is such that it almost resembles organized crime,” said Sólveig Anna. Necessary to enact comparable laws in Iceland Wage theft has been a topic of discussion in the Icelandic labor market, not least in connection with the status of foreign workers and dumping in certain sectors. From Fjeldstad's lecture and the discussions that followed, it can be concluded that clear and unequivocal legislation, where wage theft is defined as a punishable economic crime, would be a powerful way to protect the rights of workers and promote healthier competition. It is clear that such legislation is necessary in Iceland, as it would strengthen the position of workers and set clear limits to ensure that wage theft will not be tolerated. Efling calls on the government to act immediately and follow the example of our neighbors in Norway.
Ragnar Þór Ingólfsson, Minister of Social Affairs and Housing, addressed Efling Parliament this morning and emphasized the importance of the union members' struggle for improved conditions and rights. He said that the parliament marks a historic turning point and praised Efling for calling its members together for discussion and policy-making. In his speech, the Minister focused his words specifically on Efling members and their importance in Icelandic society. "We need these hardworking hands, without them the wheels of the economy cannot turn," he said, adding that it was unacceptable that employees, especially foreign workers, were being treated badly. "Such treatment should not be tolerated," he reiterated. Ragnar Þór also emphasized that the government wanted to work closely with the labor movement and use its experience to combat violations in the labor market. He said that he would work on measures that would ensure that collective agreements are respected and that employees return home from work safely. In a direct message to Efling members, he said that their struggle had made a difference for the rights of working people in Iceland. He encouraged Efling members to continue their vigorous struggle and take an active part in the work of the association. Housing issues were also high on the agenda in the address. The Minister called the situation in the rental market unacceptable and called for further development and measures to ensure housing security. He recalled that Efling had provided the government with important restraint in this area. Finally, he looked to the future and pointed out that despite technological changes and new challenges, the need for a strong labor movement will never disappear. He encouraged Efling members to continue to stand together and shape the future of the labor market. After the address, the Minister also answered numerous questions from members of parliament on various issues, with housing issues being particularly prominent in the discussion.
Dear comrades. In recent years, we have not only had to fight employers and the Icelandic ruling class – we have also had to deal with numerous problems within the labor movement – problems related to the fact that the movement had abandoned real labor struggle and was instead busy ensuring an even better quality of life for the well-off – ensuring that workers did not negotiate collective bargaining themselves, but that it was entirely in the hands of university-educated experts and their Excel calculations. Our fighting spirit and militant approach to the class struggle exposed a profound ideological disagreement about how best to fight. That exposure was necessary and long overdue. From the first moment in 2018, we faced great opposition – and from day one we have had to make difficult decisions in all our work within the working people’s movement. The first question we had to answer was this: Are we going to let the office fortress capture us and lock us in so that the status quo can be secured, the continuation of the powerlessness of workers within the Icelandic labor movement – or are we going to challenge deep-rooted and harmful traditions and practices that do not serve the interests of workers, work against the interests of workers – are we going to go our own way, independent and bold? Our answer – we are going to go our own way – caused a huge uproar and caused us great problems – but we never deviated from the path we wanted to take and did not give up. That is why we have managed to create a real front for ourselves, that is why we finally enjoy respect – that is why no one can now silence our voice. We broke the silence that had fallen on the labor struggle in the capital area – we refused to remain silent, in a corner, at the back of the line. We rejected the idea that the only role of labor was to toil so that others could have a good time. We rejected the old leadership and the corruption and self-importance that had taken root in our society. We completely changed the conversation – we stepped out of the shadows and into the spotlight – united, strong, proud. We rejected whining and complaining, being victims, having a hard time – we said it loud and clear so that everyone had to listen: “We create value – we are indispensable”. We are the force that can stop everything – and that is why we are the force that moves society forward – makes it better – makes it – makes it more equal – makes it more just. ———– Dear comrades. The story that I have briefly recounted here proves one thing without a doubt: when we come together, organized and fighting, we are strongest. And as we have organized ourselves and made our association the leading workers' organization in Iceland, we have always found time to come together in friendship, joy and fun. Christmas parties, May Day celebrations, food and culture – such togetherness with friends and families is also what binds us together in respect and friendship – it becomes an inspiration for us when we need it – when we have to deal with difficulties and problems. Dear comrades. It is important that we are all on the same page about what our parliament is and what it is not. If we look at Efling statutes, there is no mention of Efling parliament and therefore the parliament has no formal status. The parliament is really an experiment – a journey into previously uncharted territory – initiated by the board of the association in cooperation with the board of trustees. And now, as our parliament is being convened, I cannot help but be filled with anticipation. 200 Efling members are here as parliament delegates. The majority are already active in the social and political work of the association. Trustees, board members, representatives of the board of trustees, people who have participated in collective bargaining, strikes – struggles – come together to discuss important, highly political issues and reach a conclusion. We are experienced people and therefore we know that it is rarely the case that everything is perfect on the first try. We may have to deal with minor problems related to organization here in the assembly – and there will undoubtedly be times when we need to figure out something together that we perhaps did not foresee. That is why it is important that we show each other patience – be constructive and friendly first and foremost. We are not going to rush and argue – we are going to talk and listen to each other. If things do not go exactly as planned, we do not make too much of it – we focus on finding a solution together and move on. If we do well today and tomorrow, which I am actually convinced that it will be – then I do not think it is unlikely that Efling þing will be held again and can become a powerful part of the democratic awakening of our association. Dear members. I am fully aware that there are a huge number of issues burning for us who belong to Efling . The cost of housing, both for tenants and owners, lies like a bruise on Efling members and families. Wage theft and breach of contract are persistent problems that the ruling class refuses to face – because its members are not exposed to the crime. Conditions in the workplace and the numerous problems we have to deal with there are harmful to our lives – reducing our quality of life by causing worry, stress and insecurity. We are going to focus on these issues. The Efling board and the board of trustees have put a lot of work into the preparations leading up to the assembly – the chairman encouraged the board of trustees to express their wishes about which issues should be discussed and based on the responses and information, the board of trustees chose the four issues that are currently on the agenda: Housing: Conditions for buyers and owners. Housing: Conditions for tenants. Wage theft and violations of collective agreements. Empowerment in the workplace. But despite the fact that these four issues are on the agenda, we can – and in fact we should – discuss everything that is important to Efling members. This is our assembly, our space and our trade union. We intend to have open and sincere discussions about member issues – maybe not about anything – we may save that until the assembly party… but about almost anything! But I ask for your understanding on this: To maintain focus and ensure that the outcome of the work of the Assembly is absolutely clear, we will all help to ensure that the aforementioned four issues are the main focus. We have as a basis four well-developed proposals on these issues, formulated by the Council of Trustees after detailed discussions. It is important that we focus our collective energy on delivering strong, unanimous or near-unanimous statements from the work of the groups. The goal of each group in the group work is to strive to achieve consensus by allowing all voices to be heard. But I want to make it clear that even if ideas and discussions do not become resolutions here at the Assembly, this does not mean that nothing will happen about it. Here at the parliament, there are group leaders and secretaries, and their role is to write down all ideas and speculations, even if they are not directly related to the content of the resolutions, because we want to have reliable sources of everything that burned in the hearts Efling members at Efling parliament in February 2026, so that the board and the board of trustees can continue to work on it in their future work. I will just say a few words about democracy. It is often pretended that democracy is nothing more than rules and laws and votes every few years. Of course, all of this is very important – but the fact is that real, living democracy is a combination of two fundamentals; formal rules and then the participation of people in discussing and shaping what ultimately matters – which is the conclusion about where to go, for what purpose and with what methods. And for that to happen, people need to feel that they are being listened to! – that they are welcome in the discussion! – people need to experience respect! – and that it is quite obvious that their voice matters! We in Efling can have the most perfect laws in the whole world, but if our members do not feel welcome, if they do not feel that their voice and opinions are not taken seriously, then we have failed miserably. Then the laws are not even worth the paper they are written on: Because democracy is about building real participation – about creating spaces like here today and tomorrow – where people WANT TO PARTICIPATE because they know they are being listened to! Therefore, as we begin this historic session, we will all stand together in remembering this: We discuss the issues with passion and we express our opinions with determination – we may disagree, this is how we practice speaking and listening, explaining and understanding – this is how we sharpen our ideas and positions. But we will not forget – we will never forget – that we are on the same team, today and tomorrow – that is how we can be on the same team every day. For the struggle ahead, like the one behind, will require unity and deep solidarity. It will require us to look at all the many and real obstacles that stand in our way – the capitalists who think they can control everything and own everything, a political class that would rather serve the interests of the rich than ensure a just society, employers and bosses who want to get their way without considering what WE want and WE need – and say, so loudly that no one can be unheard, no one can be unheard – with one voice: We are the workforce. We create value. We are indispensable. We are Empowerment. And "we are unstoppable when we decide to stand together! We intend to make this first Efling assembly a great victory. Since 2018, we have written the history of the workers of the capital region - let's now begin writing the next chapter. I declare that the first Efling assembly is hereby established!"
